The Tension Between the Apology and Crito Essays -

Every once in a while, someone will say something at a certain point in life and later on life say something that contradicts the first statement. In most cases, these statements get unnoticed or overlooked because we are all human and may have different opinions at different instances in time. We could also say that the person who contradicted themselves did not fully develop their thoughts and that is why they were inconsistent in their thoughts. In the case of Socrates, there is an inconsistency problem between two texts because he appears to say one thing in the Apology and the opposite in Crito. It is documented that in one text he says that no matter the case one must always obey the law and in the other text he says one must disobey the law if unjust. At first glance, it seems that Socrates is contradictory and in the case of philosophy contradiction is unacceptable unless justified. Due to the fact that Socrates is such brilliant mind and a famous philosopher we must explore this problem to the deep roots in order to resolve the problem. After delving into this topic further, I will explain that the inconsistency problem is solved by Socrates consistent belief in the leadership of god. In what follows, I will describe why there is tension between the two texts and give you my interpretation of Socrates beliefs. Let us begin by developing the background of the story and then summarizing what was said by Socrates in both passages. We do not have the exact account of what happened because there were no records kept during his lifetime but we do have what is thought to be a very accurate portrayal. It is said, Socrates was accused of both formal and informal charges. The formal charges against him are for corrupting the youth and worshipping false gods. The informal charges accuse him of being a Sophist. As a result of the formal charges, Socrates is put on trial and given a chance to plead his case. During the trial Socrates is trying to convince the jury that he is not a Sophist and explains he does not except payment for opening the minds of others. He goes on to defend himself by discrediting his accusers and expresses his loyalty to Apollo. During Socrates defense in the Apology, he states ?Suppose ? you were to say to me, ?Socrates, we will not obey Anytus this time. Instead, we are prepa red to let you go. But on the following condition: that you spend no more time on this investigation and don?t practice philosophy, and if you?re caught doing so, you?ll die.? Well, as I just said, if you were to let me go on these terms, I?d reply to you, ?I?ve the utmost respect and affection for you, men of Athens, but I?ll obey the god rather than you, and as long as I draw breath and am able, I won?t give up practicing philosophy? (29c-d). This statement reads that if Socrates were ordered by law to stop practicing philosophy that he would disobey orders and not follow the law. At the end of the trial, Socrates is found guilty and sentenced to death. After being sentenced, Socrates is sent to be held imprisoned until it is time for his execution. During his captivity, Crito; a loyal friend of Socrates comes to visit and shares the news with Socrates that his execution day in is the very near future. Crito then says that he has a plan to help Socrates escape, flee the city, and avoid his execution. He states that he and others are willing to accept the consequences whatever they may be to save the life of their dear friend Socrates. Though he contemplates escaping, Socrates makes the decision it is unjust to disobey the law and in Crito says, ?in war and in law courts, and everywhere else, [you must] do whatever your city or father land commands or else persuade it as to what is really just? (51b-c). This statement reads that whatever it is that the courts orders are supreme and the law must be followed in all circumstances unless you can persuade the